- Home
-
Solutions
-
Assessments
Learn about assessmentsAssessments for everyone
- Case studies
- Plans
- Professionals
- Blog
- Log In
When we sought to use AI to explore Elise Stefanik's Transactions factors, we chose a straightforward approach. We provided Grok, (the advanced AI developed by xAI) with the same survey prompts a human respondent would receive. Grok completed the survey phase just as a human would, offering responses as any individual familiar with Stefanik would do. (read more...)
Why Grok?: Grok stands out for its ability to synthesise vast data sets to draw coherent, insightful conclusions. Its design allows for an outside perspective on humanity which, when applied to understanding someone like Elise Stefanik, brings to light patterns, paradigms and behaviours as though a human had conducted the assessment.
Validity of AI Insights: With its capacity to process and analyse information on a scale beyond human capability, Grok brings to the table a depth of analysis that matches most human insights. This extensive data processing power ensures that the results are informed and nuanced.
Consistency and Human-Likeness: Our standard survey processing revealed that Grok maintained consistency across responses, displaying characteristics akin to human reasoning. This consistency check underscored the AI's ability to engage with the survey in a manner that closely resembles human thought processes, affirming the validity of its responses.
How we go about making decisions is really important, which is why the first six behaviours in Elise’s Transactions assessment focus on six “qualitative” thought processes.
These decision styles shine a light on Elise’s personal blend of decision modes. Reasoning and logic for example require conscious, critical thought, whereas intuition, assertion, fate and magical thought processes do not (although they too have valid uses).
We then examine five modes of interpersonal communication. Together, these two parts gauge the effectiveness of interpersonal transactions between individuals and in teams.
Lastly we look at Elise’s perception of how effectively she combines rational thinking and productive communication.
Looking firstly at the Reasoning decision process, indications are strong that Elise keeps an open mind and avoids prejudging issues, looking at possibilities and alternative solutions before deciding.
Elise defines a problem first and then gathers and assesses facts with (amongst other decision modes) a strong emphasis on Logic. She draws valid conclusions and develops alternative solutions with proof of their correctness.
Elise relies on Intuition, insights, hunches and guesswork to arrive at answers. She has the potential to think creatively and to short-circuit problems, but needs to verify answers logically.
Moving on to Assertion. Elise has a ready answer, and she readily forms opinions based on assumptions, experience, beliefs and values. This behaviour will be useful where prompt answers are needed, but only if Elise is truly familiar with the situation.
Where matters of Fate are concerned, Elise shows some preference for this decision mode. She might be inclined go along with the flow of events - but under some conditions she may decide instead to take action to influence events.
Elise places very little credence in the idea that things happen "as if by Magic". She looks behind issues and events to find cause-and-effect relationships, believing there are practical explanations that could be discovered.
Elise tends to keep firm control over others, ensuring that they follow the rules. She can be Judgmental and to a certain extent she uses criticism and disapproval to influence others, which can limit openness.
She puts caring and concern for others ahead of self-interest. A Supportive person, Elise offers well-intended advice and guides people into ’what’s best’. This can be a two-edged sword as it also has the potential to stifle individual responsibility and initiative.
Moderately Objective and detached, Elise remains calm, thinks before responding, and chooses responses to suit each situation. She tends not to get caught up in others’ emotions, and may on occasion be thought indifferent or lacking humour.
Elise keeps her Natural feelings somewhat in check, and doesn’t often allow herself to show enthusiasm, excitement or ’negative’ feelings easily.
When it comes to group pressure, Elise shows very little inclination for being Adaptive. Instead, she thinks and acts independently of such pressures.
The last factor in this report deals with making transactions effective by combining rational thinking with productive communication. The Reasoning and Logic decision processes work well with Objective communicating but, in different environments, other combinations can work well too. What actually works will depend on Elise’s circumstances, as well as the range of learned and creative responses that stream from her personal behavioural archives.
Lastly, when exploring how Effective Elise rates her decision making, the result shows that she usually makes balanced and timely decisions that lead to wanted results. She also reviews and revises her decisions to keep on chosen path.
Promana
Describe anecdotes and examples from her past that might have informed your survey responses and led to the result
Elise Stefanik's approach to politics and leadership is heavily rooted in Logic, where she consistently demonstrates a preference for making decisions based on solid reasoning and evidence. This was evident in her rise through the Republican ranks, where she meticulously analyzed policy impacts to support her advocacy for certain legislation, showing a strong inclination towards Logic over other methods of decision-making.
Her Reasoning is also notable, as she often engages in detailed policy discussions, which allows her to craft solutions that align with her political stance and the needs of her constituents. An example would be her involvement in military and intelligence issues, where she uses a fact-based approach to argue for or against certain policies.
Despite her logical approach, Stefanik does not shy away from Intuition. Her ability to quickly adapt to political changes and anticipate shifts in voter sentiment or party dynamics underscores an intuitive understanding of political landscapes. This was seen in her support for certain policies that, while not always popular initially, later proved to align with emerging trends.
Her Assertion in her beliefs and policies is strong, often positioning herself as a vocal critic or supporter in debates, particularly around national security and education. This assertiveness is balanced by her Supportive nature towards her party and her base, as she often works to unify rather than divide, reflecting a moderate score in this area.
However, Fate and Magic rank lowest in her decision-making process, indicating that she does not leave outcomes to chance or unexplained phenomena. Her political strategy is far from being whimsically driven; she relies on hard work, strategic planning, and policy knowledge, not on hoping for a fortuitous turn of events.
In terms of Judgemental versus Supportive, while she might come across as judgmental in her critique of opposing policies, she also shows supportiveness by guiding her peers, evidenced by her leadership roles within the GOP. This duality reflects her balanced view in political engagements.
Her Objective nature is a cornerstone of her political persona, striving to address issues with an eye towards facts rather than personal biases, which sometimes leads to her being seen as more objective than many of her colleagues.
Natural and Adaptive are less pronounced in her political style. Stefanik's approach tends towards structured and calculated moves rather than spontaneous or naturally flowing decisions. Her adaptability is present, but it's more a calculated shift based on political necessity rather than a fluid, organic adaptation to circumstances.
Lastly, her Effectiveness in implementing policies or achieving political goals, while not her highest score, shows she has a reasonable capacity to effect change, though it might not be as pronounced as her logical or assertive traits.
xAI