- Home
-
Solutions
-
Assessments
Learn about assessmentsAssessments for everyone
- Case studies
- Plans
- Professionals
- Blog
- Log In
When we sought to use AI to explore Chris Wright's Transactions factors, we chose a straightforward approach. We provided Grok, (the advanced AI developed by xAI) with the same survey prompts a human respondent would receive. Grok completed the survey phase just as a human would, offering responses as any individual familiar with Wright would do. (read more...)
Why Grok?: Grok stands out for its ability to synthesise vast data sets to draw coherent, insightful conclusions. Its design allows for an outside perspective on humanity which, when applied to understanding someone like Chris Wright, brings to light patterns, paradigms and behaviours as though a human had conducted the assessment.
Validity of AI Insights: With its capacity to process and analyse information on a scale beyond human capability, Grok brings to the table a depth of analysis that matches most human insights. This extensive data processing power ensures that the results are informed and nuanced.
Consistency and Human-Likeness: Our standard survey processing revealed that Grok maintained consistency across responses, displaying characteristics akin to human reasoning. This consistency check underscored the AI's ability to engage with the survey in a manner that closely resembles human thought processes, affirming the validity of its responses.
How we go about making decisions is really important, which is why the first six behaviours in Chris’s Transactions assessment focus on six “qualitative” thought processes.
These decision styles shine a light on Chris’s personal blend of decision modes. Reasoning and logic for example require conscious, critical thought, whereas intuition, assertion, fate and magical thought processes do not (although they too have valid uses).
We then examine five modes of interpersonal communication. Together, these two parts gauge the effectiveness of interpersonal transactions between individuals and in teams.
Lastly we look at Chris’s perception of how effectively he combines rational thinking and productive communication.
Looking firstly at the Reasoning decision process, indications are strong that Chris keeps an open mind and avoids prejudging issues, looking at possibilities and alternative solutions before deciding.
Chris defines a problem first and then gathers and assesses facts with (amongst other decision modes) a strong emphasis on Logic. He draws valid conclusions and develops alternative solutions with proof of their correctness.
Chris relies on Intuition, insights, hunches and guesswork to arrive at answers. He has the potential to think creatively and to short-circuit problems, but needs to verify answers logically.
Moving on to Assertion. Chris has a ready answer, and he readily forms opinions based on assumptions, experience, beliefs and values. This behaviour will be useful where prompt answers are needed, but only if Chris is truly familiar with the situation.
Chris shows moderately strong indication that he can go with the flow of events, letting Fate decide as issues run their course and resolve themselves.
Chris places little credence in the idea that things happen "as if by Magic". He looks behind issues and events to find cause-and-effect relationships, believing there are practical explanations that could be discovered. He’ll be willing to accept some ""unknowable things"" where he believes delving into the complexities is unnecessary.
Chris shows only a slight inclination to be Judgmental. To some extent he expects people to be self-disciplined, preferring not to pressure them unnecessarily. Although he may feel uncomfortable enforcing rules or ’telling people off’, he may still be inclined to ensure that people follow rules, where appropriate.
He puts caring and concern for others ahead of self-interest. A Supportive person, Chris offers well-intended advice and guides people into ’what’s best’. This can be a two-edged sword as it also has the potential to stifle individual responsibility and initiative.
Moderately Objective and detached, Chris remains calm, thinks before responding, and chooses responses to suit each situation. He tends not to get caught up in others’ emotions, and may on occasion be thought indifferent or lacking humour.
Chris usually keeps his Natural feelings in check, prefering not to show enthusiasm, excitement or ’negative’ feelings. That’s not to say that he can’t be enthusiastic or spontaneous - it’s just that those moments won’t always seem appropriate to him.
When it comes to group pressure, Chris shows very little inclination for being Adaptive. Instead, he thinks and acts independently of such pressures.
The last factor in this report deals with making transactions effective by combining rational thinking with productive communication. The Reasoning and Logic decision processes work well with Objective communicating but, in different environments, other combinations can work well too. What actually works will depend on Chris’s circumstances, as well as the range of learned and creative responses that stream from his personal behavioural archives.
Lastly, on Chris’s perception of how Effective his decisions are, he indicates that he can tend to decide an issue, then hold to it until circumstances force some sort of change. But this is not always the case and under the right conditions he will make and review his balanced and timely decisions in order to stay focused.
Promana
Using a prose style without bullet points, give anecdotes and examples to back up these results
Chris displays a strong inclination towards reasoning and logic in his approach to energy policy. His career in engineering and his focus on fracking technology would suggest that he methodically examines all facets of a problem, piecing together facts with precision. For instance, when addressing environmental concerns, he would likely advocate for solutions that are grounded in scientific data and proven methodologies rather than speculative or emotional responses.
His reliance on intuition is also significant, evidenced by his ability to envision the potential of natural gas in shaping energy policy. This intuition, however, does not overshadow his logical approach but complements it, allowing him to make leaps in thinking that can lead to innovative solutions, like expanding natural gas exports despite opposition.
When it comes to assertion, Wright's public skepticism about climate change demonstrates a firm stance. His assertions aren't just bold claims but are often backed by his interpretation of data, showcasing his preference for stating what he believes based on his understanding, even if it stirs controversy.
Wright's views on fate and magic might be less pronounced. His nomination for a high-profile government position shows he doesn't leave outcomes to chance; instead, he actively shapes his path through policy influence and industry advocacy. His skepticism might also dismiss any notion of "magic" in how energy systems work, focusing instead on the tangible and explainable aspects of energy production.
In terms of being judgemental, his critical stance on climate change policies could be seen as such, but it stems more from a challenge to what he views as popular but unsubstantiated narratives rather than a personal bias. His leadership style, while assertive, isn't about harshly judging others but about setting a clear direction based on his beliefs.
As for being supportive, Chris Wright's role might involve guiding others in the industry, especially in how energy policy should evolve, but his support is more directive, aimed at aligning others with his vision rather than unconditionally supporting all ideas or solutions.
His objectivity, or the lack of strong preference indicated by our survey, might sometimes be questioned when his views on climate change are analyzed, suggesting that while he values objective data, his interpretation of this data can be selective to fit his narrative.
Finally, the lesser presence of adaptability, natural behavior, and effectiveness in the survey results could reflect his strong, often unwavering stance on energy policy, where adaptation might be seen more as a strategic move rather than an inherent characteristic. His effectiveness might be limited by his controversial views, which, while assertive and logical to him, could polarize rather than mobilize consensus in a politically diverse environment. However, this does not imply he is ineffective in his industry or role, but rather that his effectiveness might be perceived differently by those who align or disagree with his views.
xAI