- Home
-
Solutions
-
Assessments
Learn about assessmentsAssessments for everyone
- Case studies
- Plans
- Professionals
- Blog
- Log In
When we sought to use AI to explore Kristi Noem's Transactions factors, we chose a straightforward approach. We provided Grok, (the advanced AI developed by xAI) with the same survey prompts a human respondent would receive. Grok completed the survey phase just as a human would, offering responses as any individual familiar with Noem would do. (read more...)
Why Grok?: Grok stands out for its ability to synthesise vast data sets to draw coherent, insightful conclusions. Its design allows for an outside perspective on humanity which, when applied to understanding someone like Kristi Noem, brings to light patterns, paradigms and behaviours as though a human had conducted the assessment.
Validity of AI Insights: With its capacity to process and analyse information on a scale beyond human capability, Grok brings to the table a depth of analysis that matches most human insights. This extensive data processing power ensures that the results are informed and nuanced.
Consistency and Human-Likeness: Our standard survey processing revealed that Grok maintained consistency across responses, displaying characteristics akin to human reasoning. This consistency check underscored the AI's ability to engage with the survey in a manner that closely resembles human thought processes, affirming the validity of its responses.
How we go about making decisions is really important, which is why the first six behaviours in Kristi’s Transactions assessment focus on six “qualitative” thought processes.
These decision styles shine a light on Kristi’s personal blend of decision modes. Reasoning and logic for example require conscious, critical thought, whereas intuition, assertion, fate and magical thought processes do not (although they too have valid uses).
We then examine five modes of interpersonal communication. Together, these two parts gauge the effectiveness of interpersonal transactions between individuals and in teams.
Lastly we look at Kristi’s perception of how effectively she combines rational thinking and productive communication.
Looking firstly at the Reasoning decision process, indications are moderately strong that Kristi keeps an open mind and avoids prejudging issues, looking at possibilities and alternative solutions before deciding.
Kristi defines a problem first and then gathers and assesses facts with (amongst other decision modes) a strong emphasis on Logic. She draws valid conclusions and develops alternative solutions with proof of their correctness.
Kristi relies on Intuition, insights, hunches and guesswork to arrive at answers. She has the potential to think creatively and to short-circuit problems, but needs to verify answers logically.
Moving on to Assertion. Kristi has a ready answer, and she readily forms opinions based on assumptions, experience, beliefs and values. This behaviour will be useful where prompt answers are needed, but only if Kristi is truly familiar with the situation.
Where matters of Fate are concerned, Kristi shows some preference for this decision mode. She might be inclined go along with the flow of events - but under some conditions she may decide instead to take action to influence events.
Kristi places very little credence in the idea that things happen "as if by Magic". She looks behind issues and events to find cause-and-effect relationships, believing there are practical explanations that could be discovered.
Kristi tends to keep firm control over others, ensuring that they follow the rules. She can be Judgmental and to a certain extent she uses criticism and disapproval to influence others, which can limit openness.
She puts caring and concern for others ahead of self-interest. A Supportive person, Kristi offers well-intended advice and guides people into ’what’s best’. This can be a two-edged sword as it also has the potential to stifle individual responsibility and initiative.
Moderately Objective and detached, Kristi remains calm, thinks before responding, and chooses responses to suit each situation. She tends not to get caught up in others’ emotions, and may on occasion be thought indifferent or lacking humour.
Kristi usually keeps her Natural feelings in check, prefering not to show enthusiasm, excitement or ’negative’ feelings. That’s not to say that she can’t be enthusiastic or spontaneous - it’s just that those moments won’t always seem appropriate to her.
When it comes to group pressure, Kristi shows some inclination for being Adaptive to such pressures. But if the situation calls for it she will work to fit into the group.
The last factor in this report deals with making transactions effective by combining rational thinking with productive communication. The Reasoning and Logic decision processes work well with Objective communicating but, in different environments, other combinations can work well too. What actually works will depend on Kristi’s circumstances, as well as the range of learned and creative responses that stream from her personal behavioural archives.
Lastly, on Kristi’s perception of how Effective her decisions are, she indicates that she can tend to decide an issue, then hold to it until circumstances force some sort of change. But this is not always the case and under the right conditions she will make and review her balanced and timely decisions in order to stay focused.
Promana
Do you think these results accurately describe Kristi Noem? Please add a few examples and anecdotes to support the results.
Certainly, here are some real examples and anecdotes that align with the factors being explored:
Reasoning and Logic: When faced with the COVID-19 crisis, Noem chose not to issue a statewide mask mandate, reasoning that individual liberty should not be overridden by government mandates. She argued that her decision was based on data which showed people in South Dakota were not infecting each other at shopping malls or restaurants, thus reflecting her logical approach to governance while also appealing to her constituents' values.
Intuition: Noem's decision to endorse Donald Trump early in his 2024 campaign can be seen as an intuitive move, betting on his political resurgence despite earlier losses. This endorsement paid off as Trump won the election, showcasing her political foresight or gut feeling about Trump's appeal.
Assertion: During her tenure, Noem has publicly stood firm on several issues, like her opposition to federal overreach. For instance, she was one of the first governors to oppose the potential introduction of a Central Bank Digital Currency, asserting her stance against what she perceived as an infringement on personal financial freedom.
Judgemental: Noem's comments on Native American tribes in South Dakota, where she suggested that some leaders were benefiting from drug cartels, have been interpreted as judgmental. This led to significant backlash and even bans from some tribal lands, showing her readiness to make strong, sometimes controversial judgments.
Supportive: Despite the controversy, Noem has also shown support for South Dakota's tribal communities by investing in tribal education and infrastructure, indicating a supportive aspect to her governance when not in conflict.
Objectivity: Her approach to managing the state during the economic fallout from the pandemic included not accepting elevated unemployment benefits, arguing that this would encourage people to seek work rather than stay unemployed. This could be seen as an objective decision aimed at economic recovery, though it was debated for its lack of immediate support for individuals.
Effectiveness: Noem's effective political maneuvering was evident when she managed to secure a permit to hold a fireworks display at Mount Rushmore for Independence Day during the pandemic, despite environmental concerns and opposition. This event was seen as a symbol of defiance against lockdown measures, which resonated with many in her state and beyond.
Adaptability: In response to public and media scrutiny over her book "No Going Back," where she detailed the death of her dog Cricket, Noem adapted her narrative in interviews to focus on the tough decisions leaders must make, showcasing her ability to adapt her public messaging to mitigate backlash.
These examples illustrate how Kristi Noem's leadership and public persona might be perceived through the lens of the explored Transactions factors. Each anecdote reflects a facet of her approach to governance and personal style, though they are subject to various interpretations based on one's political perspective or personal values.
xAI