- Home
-
Solutions
-
Assessments
Learn about assessmentsAssessments for everyone
- Case studies
- Plans
- Professionals
- Blog
- Log In
When we sought to use AI to explore Scott Bessent's Transactions factors, we chose a straightforward approach. We provided Grok, (the advanced AI developed by xAI) with the same survey prompts a human respondent would receive. Grok completed the survey phase just as a human would, offering responses as any individual familiar with Bessent would do. (read more...)
Why Grok?: Grok stands out for its ability to synthesise vast data sets to draw coherent, insightful conclusions. Its design allows for an outside perspective on humanity which, when applied to understanding someone like Scott Bessent, brings to light patterns, paradigms and behaviours as though a human had conducted the assessment.
Validity of AI Insights: With its capacity to process and analyse information on a scale beyond human capability, Grok brings to the table a depth of analysis that matches most human insights. This extensive data processing power ensures that the results are informed and nuanced.
Consistency and Human-Likeness: Our standard survey processing revealed that Grok maintained consistency across responses, displaying characteristics akin to human reasoning. This consistency check underscored the AI's ability to engage with the survey in a manner that closely resembles human thought processes, affirming the validity of its responses.
How we go about making decisions is really important, which is why the first six behaviours in Scott’s Transactions assessment focus on six “qualitative” thought processes.
These decision styles shine a light on Scott’s personal blend of decision modes. Reasoning and logic for example require conscious, critical thought, whereas intuition, assertion, fate and magical thought processes do not (although they too have valid uses).
We then examine five modes of interpersonal communication. Together, these two parts gauge the effectiveness of interpersonal transactions between individuals and in teams.
Lastly we look at Scott’s perception of how effectively he combines rational thinking and productive communication.
Looking firstly at the Reasoning decision process, indications are strong that Scott keeps an open mind and avoids prejudging issues, looking at possibilities and alternative solutions before deciding.
Scott defines a problem first and then gathers and assesses facts with (amongst other decision modes) a strong emphasis on Logic. He draws valid conclusions and develops alternative solutions with proof of their correctness.
Scott relies on Intuition, insights, hunches and guesswork to arrive at answers. He has the potential to think creatively and to short-circuit problems, but needs to verify answers logically.
Moving on to Assertion. Scott has a ready answer, and he readily forms opinions based on assumptions, experience, beliefs and values. This behaviour will be useful where prompt answers are needed, but only if Scott is truly familiar with the situation.
Where matters of Fate are concerned, Scott shows some preference for this decision mode. He might be inclined go along with the flow of events - but under some conditions he may decide instead to take action to influence events.
Scott places very little credence in the idea that things happen "as if by Magic". He looks behind issues and events to find cause-and-effect relationships, believing there are practical explanations that could be discovered.
Scott tends to keep firm control over others, ensuring that they follow the rules. He can be Judgmental and to a certain extent he uses criticism and disapproval to influence others, which can limit openness.
He puts caring and concern for others ahead of self-interest. A Supportive person, Scott offers well-intended advice and guides people into ’what’s best’. This can be a two-edged sword as it also has the potential to stifle individual responsibility and initiative.
Moderately Objective and detached, Scott remains calm, thinks before responding, and chooses responses to suit each situation. He tends not to get caught up in others’ emotions, and may on occasion be thought indifferent or lacking humour.
Scott keeps his Natural feelings somewhat in check, and doesn’t often allow himself to show enthusiasm, excitement or ’negative’ feelings easily.
When it comes to group pressure, Scott shows some inclination for being Adaptive to such pressures. But if the situation calls for it he will work to fit into the group.
The last factor in this report deals with making transactions effective by combining rational thinking with productive communication. The Reasoning and Logic decision processes work well with Objective communicating but, in different environments, other combinations can work well too. What actually works will depend on Scott’s circumstances, as well as the range of learned and creative responses that stream from his personal behavioural archives.
Lastly, when exploring how Effective Scott rates his decision making, the result shows that he usually makes balanced and timely decisions that lead to wanted results. He also reviews and revises his decisions to keep on chosen path.
Promana
Provide examples and anecdotes to support these findings
Scott Bessent's approach to economic policy-making and financial management highlights a strong preference for logic and assertion. For instance, during his tenure at Soros Fund Management, Bessent was known for his logical analysis of market trends, often seen breaking down complex global economic scenarios into digestible strategies. His ability to assertively communicate these strategies to stakeholders demonstrated his confidence in his own analytical processes, often convincing others to follow his lead in investment decisions.
His intuition also plays a significant role, particularly when he's making quick decisions under pressure. An anecdote from his time as an economic advisor during Trump's campaign recounts how Bessent intuited that a particular policy shift would lead to market favorability before any data confirmed it, showcasing his intuitive grasp of economic dynamics.
However, Bessent's reliance on fate or magic in decision-making appears minimal. His career has been built on the premise that outcomes are a result of planned actions rather than serendipity. For example, when discussing potential economic downturns, he's often cited as preparing comprehensive contingency plans rather than hoping for a lucky break.
In terms of judgment, while Bessent is not overly judgmental, he does have a critical eye for economic policies and trends. His critiques of past fiscal policies during public speeches illustrate this, where he provides a measured assessment rather than an outright dismissal, showing a balance between judgment and supportiveness.
When it comes to supportiveness, Bessent's history shows a tendency to support emerging economies or sectors he believes in, often advocating for policies that would nurture these areas. His involvement in educational programs aimed at teaching young people about finance further exemplifies his supportive nature, aiming to uplift others through knowledge.
Objectivity is another trait where Bessent excels. In economic forums, he's known for presenting data-driven arguments, minimizing personal bias, and focusing on what the numbers suggest. This approach was particularly evident when he discussed the implications of tax reforms, where he laid out a clear, objective analysis rather than a partisan stance.
Lastly, while Bessent's methods are systematic, his adaptability isn't as pronounced. His strategies often cater to what he deems most effective within the current economic framework rather than adapting rapidly to new, untested economic theories or sudden market shifts. This was evident during the volatile market conditions at the onset of his career where he relied on proven economic models rather than experimental approaches to navigate through the uncertainty.
These anecdotal examples illustrate how Bessent's strengths lie in logical reasoning, assertive communication, and objective analysis, while he shows less inclination towards relying on fate, magic, or overly adaptive strategies.
xAI