- Home
-
Solutions
-
Assessments
Learn about assessmentsAssessments for everyone
- Case studies
- Plans
- Professionals
- Blog
- Log In
When we sought to use AI to explore Peter Jackson's Action Style factors, we chose a straightforward approach. We provided Grok, (the advanced AI developed by xAI) with the same survey prompts a human respondent would receive. Grok completed the survey phase just as a human would, offering responses as any individual familiar with Jackson would do. (read more...)
Why Grok?: Grok stands out for its ability to synthesise vast data sets to draw coherent, insightful conclusions. Its design allows for an outside perspective on humanity which, when applied to understanding someone like Peter Jackson, brings to light patterns, paradigms and behaviours as though a human had conducted the assessment.
Validity of AI Insights: With its capacity to process and analyse information on a scale beyond human capability, Grok brings to the table a depth of analysis that matches most human insights. This extensive data processing power ensures that the results are informed and nuanced.
Consistency and Human-Likeness: Our standard survey processing revealed that Grok maintained consistency across responses, displaying characteristics akin to human reasoning. This consistency check underscored the AI's ability to engage with the survey in a manner that closely resembles human thought processes, affirming the validity of its responses.
The factors and behaviours in this report are based primarily on ten well-known principles of strategy and tactics. In effect, these principles describe what people do (or will do) to get what they want.
As well as the basic ten precepts, two further factors are added. These factors ‘Set Priorities’ and ‘Evaluate Results’, serve to put these action principles into context for Peter.
Peter consciously thinks ahead to Set Priorities in what he considers to be the right order. He considers his priorities to be realistic and within his capabilities, and he works to meet his deadlines.
Peter shows a strong inclination to Pursue Objectives, and he does so with single-minded determination. He chooses his objectives quite purposefully, and with some determination he directs actions and resources toward achieving them.
Peter sees some value in the collective strength of the group, and he can Collaborate, working in easily with others. He establishes reasonably close working relationships, and will share ideas, goals and methods if he sees a good reason to.
He puts a fair amount of his energy and effort into his activities, and has the capacity to push work through and overcome obstacles. He has a moderately strong inclination to Concentrate Force to get things done the hard way - if necessary.
Peter tends to look for easier ways to Economise Effort, get results and extract value from the use of his time. He seeks help and (if appropriate to his role) will probably delegate if possible. He usually takes the line of least resistance to resolve issues.
He often takes action with little thought of failure. Peter is able to Act Assertively and confront conflict. He’s capable of bringing issues to a head and less forceful people can usually be converted to his viewpoint or convinced to move out of the way.
Peter shows a moderate to strong preference for seeking, creating and taking opportunities to act. Alert for openings, he chooses the right moment to Use Surprise and he moves quickly when that moment arrives. In this way he has a measure of ability to capitalise on situations at short notice.
He keeps reasonable control over his resources and activities, avoiding unplanned risk where he can. He intends to Operate Securely and wants to remain free from threats and surprises. He leaves little to chance.
Moving on to Peter’s inclination to Manage Morale, it’s apparent that he contributes to a reasonable degree to the feelings of success and wellbeing in the group, team or organisation. Usually calm and in good spirits, he can show concern for morale, and he supports and encourages others.
Peter is moderately inclined to Administer things. On balance he’s generally less likely to put effort into getting organised before starting anything and he may also resist being organised by others. However, when it’s appropriate he does have the capacity to coordinate and be systematic.
Peter contributes to group consistency and stability but rather than choosing to Be Flexible, he’s more inclined to focus his effort on sticking with the things he’s already committed himself to.
Lastly, when the time comes to Evaluate Results Peter indicates that he often makes a valuable contribution, and usually seeks to sustain his performance at a good standard. He sees that results come from effective self-management and positive action.
Promana
Describe incidents, anecdotes and examples form the information you have about the production of the first LOTR trilogy that correlate to the result
During the production of the first Lord of the Rings trilogy, Peter Jackson demonstrated a strong preference for setting priorities and pursuing objectives. One of the most vivid examples was his decision to shoot all three films consecutively, which required an unprecedented level of planning and priority setting. This approach ensured that the narrative continuity was maintained across the films, reflecting his ability to keep his objectives clear and his priorities straight. He knew from the outset what he wanted to achieve with the trilogy, aiming for a faithful adaptation of Tolkien's work while making it accessible to a broad audience. This focus on priorities and objectives was crucial when he decided to extend certain scenes or include additional content that wasn't in the books but served the story's cinematic narrative.
However, flexibility, as observed was not a strong suit in this context. Jackson's vision for the films was quite rigid, especially when it came to the script and the pacing of the narrative. His commitment to the storyboard was almost dogmatic; changes were minimal once set, which sometimes led to tension on set due to the lack of room for improvisation or last-minute alterations. This rigidity, while ensuring a cohesive vision, sometimes strained relations with actors and crew who needed more adaptability in their roles or tasks.
The evaluation of results was another area where Jackson shone. Post-production, especially with the extended editions, allowed for a thorough review and refinement of the films. Jackson and his team would spend countless hours in editing to ensure that each scene met the high standards they had set for themselves. This meticulous attention to detail in evaluating the results of their efforts was evident in how they managed to turn a complex narrative into an epic cinematic experience. The extended cuts, in particular, showed an appreciation for the material that could only come from a director deeply invested in evaluating and enhancing the final product.
xAI