- Home
-
Solutions
-
Assessments
Learn about assessmentsAssessments for everyone
- Case studies
- Plans
- Professionals
- Blog
- Log In
When we sought to use AI to explore Nelson Mandela's Action Style factors, we chose a straightforward approach. We provided Grok, (the advanced AI developed by xAI) with the same survey prompts a human respondent would receive. Grok completed the survey phase just as a human would, offering responses as any individual familiar with Mandela would do. (read more...)
Why Grok?: Grok stands out for its ability to synthesise vast data sets to draw coherent, insightful conclusions. Its design allows for an outside perspective on humanity which, when applied to understanding someone like Nelson Mandela, brings to light patterns, paradigms and behaviours as though a human had conducted the assessment.
Validity of AI Insights: With its capacity to process and analyse information on a scale beyond human capability, Grok brings to the table a depth of analysis that matches most human insights. This extensive data processing power ensures that the results are informed and nuanced.
Consistency and Human-Likeness: Our standard survey processing revealed that Grok maintained consistency across responses, displaying characteristics akin to human reasoning. This consistency check underscored the AI's ability to engage with the survey in a manner that closely resembles human thought processes, affirming the validity of its responses.
The factors and behaviours in this report are based primarily on ten well-known principles of strategy and tactics. In effect, these principles describe what people do (or will do) to get what they want.
As well as the basic ten precepts, two further factors are added. These factors ‘Set Priorities’ and ‘Evaluate Results’, serve to put these action principles into context for Nelson.
Nelson consciously thinks ahead to Set Priorities in what he considers to be the right order. He considers his priorities to be realistic and within his capabilities, and he works to meet his deadlines.
Nelson shows a strong inclination to Pursue Objectives, and he does so with single-minded determination. He chooses his objectives quite purposefully, and with some determination he directs actions and resources toward achieving them.
Nelson sees the value in the collective strength of the group, and he wants to Collaborate and work in with others. He establishes close working relationships, and willingly shares ideas, goals and methods as he knows why there’s good reason to do so.
He puts a fair amount of his energy and effort into his activities, and has the capacity to push work through and overcome obstacles. He has a moderately strong inclination to Concentrate Force to get things done the hard way - if necessary.
Nelson tends to look for easier ways to Economise Effort, get results and extract value from the use of his time. He seeks help and (if appropriate to his role) will probably delegate if possible. He usually takes the line of least resistance to resolve issues.
He often takes action with little thought of failure. Nelson is able to Act Assertively and confront conflict. He’s capable of bringing issues to a head and less forceful people can usually be converted to his viewpoint or convinced to move out of the way.
To some extent Nelson doesn’t Use Surprise to exploit people or situations, and he often prefers to act fairly openly. But - under the right conditions - he can seek out, create or take those opportunities to move and act quickly.
He keeps reasonable control over his resources and activities, avoiding unplanned risk where he can. He intends to Operate Securely and wants to remain free from threats and surprises. He leaves little to chance.
Moving on to Nelson’s inclination to Manage Morale, it’s apparent that he contributes to a reasonable degree to the feelings of success and wellbeing in the group, team or organisation. Usually calm and in good spirits, he can show concern for morale, and he supports and encourages others.
Nelson is moderately inclined to Administer things. On balance he’s generally less likely to put effort into getting organised before starting anything and he may also resist being organised by others. However, when it’s appropriate he does have the capacity to coordinate and be systematic.
Nelson contributes to group consistency and stability but rather than choosing to Be Flexible, he’s more inclined to focus his effort on sticking with the things he’s already committed himself to.
Although Nelson indicated that when the time comes to Evaluate Results, he can be dissatisfied with the perceived benefits, he also sees other results as being valid and worthwhile. This will be highly correlated to the situational context.
Promana
Provide anecdotes and examples from real life that correlate to the result
Nelson Mandela's leadership style was characterised by a strong emphasis on setting priorities, which was evident in his focused approach towards ending apartheid and establishing a democratic South Africa. He demonstrated this by prioritising reconciliation and nation-building over any immediate personal gains or revenge. His drive to pursue objectives was clear when he led the negotiations for the release of political prisoners and the dismantling of apartheid laws, showing an unwavering commitment to his goals.
Collaboration was another area where Mandela focused, as seen in his work with various political factions, including the National Party, to form a new government. His ability to work with former adversaries in creating the Government of National Unity is a testament to his collaborative spirit. This approach was crucial in fostering peace and stability in a post-apartheid South Africa.
Unusually for highly successful people, Mandela's observed approach to evaluating results was less pronounced. Instead of focusing on immediate outcomes or performance metrics, his leadership was more about setting the foundation for long-term change. For example, his establishment of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission aimed at healing rather than immediate retribution, illustrating a preference for process over immediate evaluation of results.
Similarly, his use of surprise was not a prominent feature of his strategy. Mandela's actions were generally predictable and transparent, focusing on building trust rather than unsettling opponents with unexpected moves. His open negotiations and public speeches were more about clarity and consensus than strategic surprise.
Flexibility was not a high priority in his visible actions; his commitment to his principles was firm, which sometimes meant sticking to his path even when other strategies might have seemed expedient. This steadfastness was crucial in the context of the monumental changes he was leading.
xAI