- Home
-
Solutions
-
Assessments
Learn about assessmentsAssessments for everyone
- Case studies
- Plans
- Professionals
- Blog
- Log In
When we sought to use AI to explore Mark Zuckerberg's Activation factors, we chose a straightforward approach. We provided Grok, (the advanced AI developed by xAI) with the same survey prompts a human respondent would receive. Grok completed the survey phase just as a human would, offering responses as any individual familiar with Zuckerberg would do. (read more...)
Why Grok?: Grok stands out for its ability to synthesise vast data sets to draw coherent, insightful conclusions. Its design allows for an outside perspective on humanity which, when applied to understanding someone like Mark Zuckerberg, brings to light patterns, paradigms and behaviours as though a human had conducted the assessment.
Validity of AI Insights: With its capacity to process and analyse information on a scale beyond human capability, Grok brings to the table a depth of analysis that matches most human insights. This extensive data processing power ensures that the results are informed and nuanced.
Consistency and Human-Likeness: Our standard survey processing revealed that Grok maintained consistency across responses, displaying characteristics akin to human reasoning. This consistency check underscored the AI's ability to engage with the survey in a manner that closely resembles human thought processes, affirming the validity of its responses.
The results shown in the Activation assessment below are grouped into five parts.
The report begins with an exploration of Mark’s “external rewards”. These three preferences (Material Reward, Career Reward and Social Reward) reveal the mix of influences from outside Mark, which move him to take action.
Next, we’ll display five “internal drives” - A Person, A Producer, A Helper, A Catalyst and Pressure of Time - each of which plays its part, not only on Mark’s potential on-the-job performance but also in the way he rates his personal satisfaction with whatever he’s doing.
To create an even more complete understanding of Mark’s activators, we delve into three separate “focus contexts”: the past, the present and the future.
Finally, we’ll complete the picture by showing Mark’s self-perception of his progress towards his own personal goals.
Remember, Material Reward, Career Reward and Social Reward are concerned with rating and comparing three external or ‘extrinsic’ rewards. The main significance of these factors is that they’re usually beyond the direct control of those who seek them. It’s likely that, as with most people, Mark has to “earn” these rewards from his environment. As his circumstances change, so his desire for these rewards will be changing, and these factors simply represent where things stand as of now.
When it comes to Material Reward, Mark is strongly influenced by the prospect of financial gain and other material benefits. He will certainly expect these as a return on his investment of personal resources, whether those resources involve the input of his time, effort, money or otherwise.
Mark is ambitious about Career Reward, and should respond well to the prospect of a leadership role, a worthwhile place in a group, team or organisation, or perhaps involvement in managerial decision making.
Mark may be someone who puts time into relationships and friendships, but this appears to provide him with only a moderate sense of Social Reward. A friendly and warm environment might not be important to him. Keep in mind that social rewards can come from negative attention too (for example social media or simply the attention gained from being a Catalyst, the preference for which is shown elsewhere in this report).
Feelings, and how we arrive at them, are a complex area. As a way of addressing that complexity, and to allow Mark the space to keep his feelings private, we examine five intrinsic recognition drivers, which report on Mark’s need for recognition as: A Person, A Producer, A Helper and A Catalyst. Also in this group is Pressure of Time, which depicts Mark’s need to gain recognition for meeting time pressures.
Mark responds favourably to acceptance as an equal and to recognition as A Person - of who he is rather and not just the role he plays or the work he does. He has good self-esteem, and thinks well of himself and others.
Mark genuinely believes himself to be A Producer. He gets real satisfaction from work itself, and from getting results. He also responds really well to open recognition of his achievements and his strong commitment to tasks.
He shows a moderate interest in pleasing others, but doesn’t feel compelled to have them accept him as A Helper. Look to A Person, A Producer, A Catalyst and Pressure of Time for stronger recognition drives.
Something of A Catalyst, he responds to difficult tasks and challenges by working to set his own objectives and priorities, and to choose his own work methods. Mark needs to feel that he has freedom to operate.
He is moderately responsive when it comes to the Pressure of Time. Deadlines and priorities will push Mark along as he seeks to meet his time commitments.
The next three behaviours, Focus on Past, Focus on Present and Focus on Future, help to place activation into a context, by reporting Mark’s orientation to past, present and future events.
When it comes to strategies for learning from experience, Mark spends little time dwelling on the past. As someone who doesn’t expect to be able to change his personal history through Focus on Past, his focus is divided instead between Focus on Present and Focus on Future.
Moving now to Mark’s Focus on Present. His preference indicates a moderate focus on the day-to-day detail of things (the balance of his focus being divided between Pressure of Time and Focus on Past).
Looking at the final factor in this "time" grouping, it’s apparent that Mark puts very little time into thinking about what might happen. Rather than Focus on Future, he chooses to orient himself towards Focus on Past and Focus on Present.
The report’s last factor, Headway, examines perceived ‘life position’, offering insight into how Mark perceives his progression when it comes to things like, for example, "Where have I come from – how did I get here – where am I now – where am I going – how do I get there – will I get there?"
When it comes to his self-perception of Headway, Mark has a moderately clear picture of the path ahead of him. It may be that he’s not yet certain about his personal objectives, or that he doesn’t feel there’s enough progression, or, it might be that he’s not clear enough yet about how to go about achieving them.